a review by the Crow.



Well, cook this crow’s pancetta and stuff his ravioli! After years of waiting, he’s finally watched Dredd. How I missed this movie for so long is beyond me, but I’ve had it on the brain for some time.

Years ago, I watched the 1995 original, after apparently watching it some time around when it first came out (my memory box doesn’t go so far back), and the only ever did the one time after. After thinking the wounds would never, ever heal (despite my worries), when word got out that a new Judge Dredd movie had hit theatres, I was hopping around all mad to see it.

However, life and circumstance got in the way, and I never did. Up until yesterday.

And whoo, birds, do we have a lot to talk about!




Dredd isn’t really that long of a movie, at first glance. However, the movie moves so well, that the nearly two-hour length of the movie flashes past in a jiffy.

It opens with an overview of Mega-City One, a scene of Judge Dredd mowing down some numpties, and an introduction to the drug Slow-Mo. A pretty good intro, all things considered.

Judge Dredd is introduced to a rookie Anderson, a powerful psychic who’s struggling with becoming a Judge. After being told to assess her, the two respond to a call from Control about some trouble over in the slum-block Peach Trees.


In Peach Trees, the crime-boss Ma Ma has had three rogue drug dealers brutally executed. As the Law later finds out, Ma Ma and her gang run the production of Slow-Mo in Mega-City One, and the fact that our heroes take in one of her aides (Kay) for interrogation rather than executing him, she is forced to seal off the slum until they are found and killed.


And that’s pretty much it to the plot.

Dredd plays it safe, in a way. It gives us a “slice of life”-style story from Dredd’s early days. This is what the guy does every day. Usually, movies (and even just stories) are based around the “once-in-a-while” sort of incident, but with Judge Dredd involved, things are different.

Now, I say early days because Anderson is clearly not a judge yet, and there seems to be no Psi Division, either.


The movie gives us snippets to establish a universe. Dredd is a very unique kind of origin story. While Dredd has already hit his stride (just look at how everyone reacts to him), the movie instead focuses on establishing the sort of world he lives in. Yes, Mega-City One is handwaved away with a few lines of dialogue, but the interactions between characters, the Easter egg-motifs presented on screen (Easter eggs to those in the know, expository to those who aren’t), and the way in which people treat others – they all come together to plant the seeds for a strong backdrop.


Ma Ma is crafted excellently, but Dredd points out that she’s really no different from what he has to deal with every other day. Domhall Gleeson’s unnamed character offers us the best insight into what everyday folks who’re good at things have to put up with on a daily basis. Anderson shows us how one’s humanity can be drained away by Mega-City One (although she retains her grip on it through to the very end).

Excellent stuff.

The only gripe I have with the story is that it lacks the over-the-top satire of the 2000AD comics. I’ve not read many of them, but it stuck out quite a bit. I don’t really think it detracts from the movie much, though.


The movie’s drained of colour until Slow-Mo is in use. The scenes are pretty, and the scenes involving Anderson’s powers have a decent visual edge to them as well.

I wouldn’t say this movie’s CGI-heavy, because it’s not. It uses overlays and editing effects to its strengths when being flashy, while leaving the CGI elements humdrum. It’s a great way to blend things together.

I dont even think I spotted a single bad performance in the movie. Everyone performs their duties admirably.


So, to recap: the movie plays it safe. It plays it humdrum. It shows us a life in the day of Judge Dredd. That doesn’t make it amazing, but it makes for a solid start.



JUDGE DREDD | Karl Urban | 10/10


Urban plays an excellent Judge Dredd. He’s a hulking, brutal man. And unlike the Sylvester Stallone incarnation of the character, he never takes off his helmet. Sure, we don’t get to see his face, and that should distance him from us. But this is Judge Dredd. He has no face. He is the Law of Mega-City One. They really nailed the character in this movie.

ANDERSON | Olivia Thirlby | 8/10


Thirlby plays a very green Anderson, and she performs well. I can’t say I’m overly familiar with the ins-and-outs of Anderson’s character, so I’ll focus on what we have in the movie.

Anderson is the more relatable, human element of the movie. She is our window into the world of Dredd, and that’s why having her be a rookie works so well in the movie. Sure, Peach Trees matures her, and sure, she becomes an efficient sidekick by the end, but she resets when there is something to care about.

MA MA | Lena Headey | 8/10


What a bad-ass villain. Her backstory is well spread out through the movie, and she is in utter control of things. Her brazen attitude to having Judges rampant in her slum is explained by the briefest glimpse at a smashed Judge’s helmet in her trophy cabinet.

She’s a cold bitch, this one. And what would you expect? Just think of her from Game of Thrones. Pretty much standard fare, as her characters go. 

KAY | Wood Harris | 7.5/10

Judge Dredd Still Image

He’s basically your standard goon. And he’s only in the movie as long as he’s more valuable alive. That said, he’s integral to the plot, and becomes one of our main characters as the plot progresses.

COMPUTER GUY(?) | Domhall Gleeson | 7/10


Aw, the poor guy! I doubt anyone would want to be in his shoes at any point during the movie. Well played, though.



Since I couldn’t say I’m a huge fan of the franchise, I do respect it for what it is.

While writing out this section, I did a quick look up online about some bits of the movie I felt needed some more knowledge on my part before I could run with it. While everything I needed seems to be good, I came across this excellent post on the movie (at Judge Tutor Semple), which I wholly recommend you check out.

It’s a damn shame that a sequel looks so unlikely. This is a great cast in a good establishing movie. I could see this spawning an amazing franchise, as long as the creative leads keep the entries under tight control. Is it too much to ask for just the one more? Maybe, now with retrospect, a re-release of the movie would help. But hey, that’s all up to the studios.

It truly is a shame that I’ve already named my Top 10 Comic book Movies of All Time, because Dredd is a solid movie that might’ve taken a spot.

Who knows? With the huge amount of comic book movies due to hit theatres soon, I might revisit that post.

Final rating: 7/10

15 thoughts on “ Review: Dredd [2012] ”

    1. Dredd truly was a delight. One of us even nominated Suicide Squad as the worst movie of last year. And to think: Suicide Squad was the first reviews we ever wrote on this blog.
      And 7/10’s pretty high praise on my behalf, actually, but I see what you’re getting at.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Oh yeeah, it well deserved that nomination. I’ve just checked your review and commented it.

        As for Dredd rating – all the reviews I publish here are only – only! – within the science fiction genre (and for 90% it’s independent), so I don’t take other film genres into consideration when giving a rating.

        Dredd surely deserved the best praise. It’s not perfect, but it got almost everything right. The Slo-Mo was awesome and being such an overused effect it’s not easy to apply it creatively. The designs – futuristic and making sense. The acting – great, with just few characters being not completely convincing. The setting was perfect. The action was exactly what we needed in amovie like this – honest and brutal.

        The movie (over-)delivers exactly what it promises. Consider that it was a risky project – the 1995 version was mostly a flop, and it’s rare that a non-franchise superhero movie gets relaunched tbese days.
        It was a big risk. It’s almost like an independent B-movie. I think it deserves some support for thisthings as well. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

        1. Your blog is really interesting. I’ve gone through a few posts yesterday while I was travelling, but I’ll be sure to give it a better look soon. I love how you concentrate on the smaller stuff.

          It does end up being an independent movie, but I’m not sure if I’d call it a B-movie. It certainly warrants the support for what it pulled off on its modest budget. It’s a damn shame it’s not going to have a sequel. I’d be willing to watch it, but the bigwigs aren’t going to chance it, as things look.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. Thanks! 🙂 I think there aren’t many blogs who concentrate on this… if you know some, let me know! I also do my best to get my English better. I hope it’s not that bad. 🙂

            Well, that’s why I said it was an almost B movie. It’s budget and setting were minimal for this kind of movie, and the fiom still was supposed to “fight” in the same league as big $150 mln blockbusters, because compared to them Dredd had very low budget. Everything is relative. Pirates of the C. 3 costed $300 mln – add the marketing and it means that for that money almost 7/8 movies like Dredd could be done.

            I am not sure about the sequel. Now when Garland is finally a director himself… that will pay off. Time will show.

            Liked by 1 person

            1. Mate, your English is pretty damn good. I noticed a few errors here and there, but I wouldn’t judge someone based on random comments. That said: we all learn as we go along. Might I please ask where you’re from, if you don’t mind?

              And I see your point. My bad with that one. Dredd did SO MUCH with its budget. It was like a marvellous piece of engineering: every bit was used efficiently.

              However, about the sequel, it doesn’t seem like it’s going to happen unless someone takes a risk (and hopefully, it’s a fan). Hollywood and mainstream cinema likes to play it way too safe. It’s a shame Dredd wasn’t marketed more efficiently. Things might’ve been so different if it had that push.

              Liked by 1 person

              1. Sure, I am originally from Latvia but have been living in Italy for almost 10 years now, and you? Thanks, I appreciate that, living in Italy doesn’t certainly help to make it better. 🙂 We’ll see. I think Garland will have a lot to say over the next decade, but a lot depends on how his next movie, Annihilation, will do.

                Liked by 1 person

                1. Hey hey! I have friends from both countries!
                  I’m British-born of Indian descent. Been about a few countries a bit, though.

                  Annihilation sounds decent. I didn’t actually know it was the same director! I hope we both see it around the same time! 😀

                  Liked by 1 person

                  1. Cool! 🙂

                    Yes, I really respect Garland’s work, he has worked on numerous scripts that turned out to be very good low key movies, mostly sci-fi, before finally directing Ex Machina.

                    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s